Deployment Architecture

Bringing Autonomous Reliability Into Secure Enclaves

Brain-outside, execution-inside architectures for regulated enterprises.

Zof Reliability Team · 2026年5月9日 · 28 min read · Updated 2026年5月19日

Why banks and regulated enterprises cannot use normal SaaS testing tools

Procurement teams ask where test data lives, who can access execution environments, and what leaves the network. Tools that require uploading production-like data to multi-tenant SaaS fail these reviews, even when the vendor is reputable.

Autonomous reliability amplifies the question: agents observe, decide, and act. Without boundary-aware design, autonomy becomes a liability.

The architecture principle: brain outside, execution inside

Intelligence and orchestration run in a control plane your security team can assess. Test and remediation execution run inside your enclave, private cloud, or on-prem footprint, where data never crosses an unapproved boundary.

Secure enclave pattern

Control plane (policy, graph, orchestration)
        │ signed work packages only
        ▼
Customer enclave: Edge Runners + local evidence
        │ sanitized egress
        ▼
Aggregated telemetry (no raw customer data)

Signed test capsules

Work sent to enclave runners arrives as signed capsules: scoped commands, timeouts, allowed endpoints, and data classification labels. Runners reject unsigned or out-of-policy packages.

Local edge runners

Edge Runners execute capsules against internal URLs, desktop clients, and private APIs. They stream artifacts to local evidence stores, not to arbitrary vendor buckets.

Customer-controlled transfer boundary

Customers define what may egress: pass/fail summaries, redacted traces, hashes, or nothing at all. Transfer policies are enforceable and auditable.

Local evidence stores

Screenshots, HAR files, and logs remain in customer-controlled storage by default. Reviewers access evidence through existing security tooling.

Sanitized egress

When telemetry leaves the enclave, it is minimized and scrubbed. The goal is operational visibility without exfiltrating sensitive payloads.

PAM and secrets

Runners integrate with privileged access management and secret vaults, short-lived credentials, no long-lived keys in vendor SaaS. Secrets never appear in agent prompts or external logs.

Auditability

Audit questions your CISO will ask

  • Who published each capsule
  • What executed in which environment
  • What evidence was produced and where it resides
  • What egress occurred and under which policy

Deployment models

ModelBest forTradeoff
SaaS control + enclave executionRegulated hybridRequires runner ops
Private cloud control planeStrict data residencyHigher infra ownership
Full on-premAir-gapped or sovereignLonger rollout

How to evaluate vendors

Ask for reference architectures, data-flow diagrams, and failure modes, not marketing claims. Validate runner isolation, capsule signing, egress policies, and evidence retention in your environment.

Final takeaway

Autonomous reliability can run in secure enclaves when architecture respects separation of intelligence and execution. Regulated buyers should demand this by default, not as a custom project.

Related product

続きを読む

01操作面

姿勢、操作、次に注意が必要なことを 1 つの面で確認できます。

Zof ホームはマーケティング ダッシュボードではありません。それは、運用面のエンジニアリング、QA、および SRE チームが毎日使用する、品質の姿勢、飛行中の実行、モジュールごとのカバレッジ、およびリーダーが次に注目すべきアクションです。

運用上の KPI

実行数、カバレッジ、リスク

出荷先のあらゆる環境に対応します。

ワークスパイン

仕様・テスト・スケジュール

仕様から計画された回帰まで。

ガードレール

RBAC・SSO・監査

指定された人間に起因するすべての行為。

LIVE/console
Zof AI ホーム コマンド センターには、94% パスでの 12 件の実行、3 つの未解決の重大な問題、84% のカバレッジ、4 つのモジュール トレーサビリティ バー、仕様パイプライン、今後のスケジュール、アクティブ実行サイドバー付きの推奨される次のアクションが表示されます。
ホーム ビュー · チェックアウト サービス · ステージング · 製品からライブでキャプチャ。
  • 01 · RUNS · 24H

    94% pass

    12 runs across staging

  • 02 · COVERAGE

    84%

    Across four modules

  • 03 · ACTIVE RUNS

    3 running

    Live on this branch

  • 04 · NEXT ACTIONS

    Recommended

    Triage gaps, new spec

Secure Enclave Testing & Autonomous Reliability | Zof AI Blog