Zof vs mabl
Intelligent testing at different levels
Both Zof and mabl aim to simplify testing with intelligence. Zof operates at the system level with autonomous agents, while mabl focuses on low-code functional testing.
Continuously maintained. Content reflects current product capabilities.
Quick Assessment
Which solution fits your needs?
An honest comparison to help you make the right choice for your organization.
Choose Zof if...
You need comprehensive test coverage
Zof covers 19 categories: security, performance, compliance, accessibility, and more.
System-level understanding matters
Zof System Graph maps your architecture for intelligent test generation and impact analysis.
You want fully autonomous agents
AI agents generate tests from system understanding without recording or manual authoring.
Enterprise scale is a requirement
Built for large organizations with SSO, audit logging, and custom SLAs.
Choose mabl if...
Low-code test creation is preferred
mabl offers intuitive low-code test creation that may suit teams avoiding code.
You primarily need E2E and API testing
mabl focuses on functional testing which may be sufficient for simpler requirements.
Quick onboarding is important
mabl is designed for fast time-to-value with minimal setup.
Your team prefers record-based authoring
mabl trainer allows building tests by interacting with your application.
Capability Comparison
Feature-by-feature comparison
A factual overview of capabilities across key areas.
| Capability | Zof | mabl |
|---|---|---|
| Test Creation | AI agents generate from system model | Low-code trainer with recording |
| Test Maintenance | Self-healing based on system understanding | Auto-healing locators |
| Coverage Breadth | 19 test categories | E2E, API, accessibility, performance |
| Security Testing | Dedicated security agents | |
| Compliance Testing | Regulatory validation | |
| System Understanding | System Graph architecture mapping | Application-level |
| API Testing | Full API test category | |
| Accessibility Testing | WCAG compliance validation | |
| Reliability Scoring | Quality insights | |
| Enterprise SSO | ||
| Platform Support | Web, mobile, and desktop applications | Web applications primarily |
Test Creation
Zof
AI agents generate from system modelmabl
Low-code trainer with recordingTest Maintenance
Zof
Self-healing based on system understandingmabl
Auto-healing locatorsCoverage Breadth
Zof
19 test categoriesmabl
E2E, API, accessibility, performanceSecurity Testing
Zof
Dedicated security agentsmabl
Compliance Testing
Zof
Regulatory validationmabl
System Understanding
Zof
System Graph architecture mappingmabl
Application-levelAPI Testing
Zof
Full API test categorymabl
Accessibility Testing
Zof
WCAG compliance validationmabl
Reliability Scoring
Zof
mabl
Quality insightsEnterprise SSO
Zof
mabl
Platform Support
Zof
Web, mobile, and desktop applicationsmabl
Web applications primarilyAdoption Path
What changes if you switch
A realistic view of the evaluation, pilot, and rollout process.
Evaluation
1-2 weeks
Connect Zof to your application. Compare AI-generated coverage and system understanding against mabl recorded tests.
Pilot
2-4 weeks
Run both solutions on a portion of your system. Compare coverage breadth, maintenance effort, and test reliability.
Common blockers
- Defining success criteria
- Resource allocation
Rollout
4-8 weeks
Migrate E2E tests to Zof. Add security, compliance, and additional coverage mabl cannot provide.
Common blockers
- CI/CD updates
- Team training
Optimization
Ongoing
Use reliability scoring to guide improvement. Expand coverage to new test categories and system areas.
Procurement & Trust
Enterprise-ready from day one
Built for the security, compliance, and governance requirements of large organizations.
FAQ
Common questions
Both mabl and Zof are low-code. What is different?
mabl is low-code through recording and visual editing. Zof is low-code through AI agents that understand your system and generate tests automatically. The approach to reducing code is fundamentally different.
mabl includes some performance and accessibility testing. How is Zof different?
mabl offers basic performance insights and accessibility checks. Zof provides dedicated agents for load testing, stress testing, security scanning, compliance validation, and 15+ additional categories with deeper capabilities in each.
Can I use both mabl and Zof together?
Yes. Some teams use mabl for quick E2E coverage while Zof handles security, compliance, and comprehensive system validation. However, Zof can cover all use cases if you prefer a single platform.
How does pricing compare?
Both offer tiered pricing. Zof pricing is usage-based. Contact both sales teams for quotes that match your specific usage patterns.
Ready to see the difference?
Schedule a personalized demo to see how Zof can improve your testing and reliability workflow.